Rhetoric
writing can be defined as a comprehensive art of writing and speaking, in order
to craft a persuasive argument that appeals to the various appeals of the
senses. Gideon Burton agrees when he writes, “Rhetoric is the study of
effective speaking and writing. And the art of persuasion. And many other
things.” At face value this quote serves the simplest form of explaining what
rhetoric is, the craft of persuading your audience with an effective speaking
and writing. But furthermore rhetoric writing has more elements than constructing
a well written paper influencing your audience, as Gideon Burton puts it, “Rhetoric
studies the effectiveness of language comprehensively, including its emotional
impact”. Appealing to the senses of your audience is one of the main core
concepts of constructing rhetoric writings, without it the paper would lack the
depth to persuade a reader or a listener. The appeal to logic, emotion, and one’s
character, provide the argument with personal characteristics making the argument
come to life and giving the audience personal connection. Gideon Burton himself
writes, “One way to understand the overlapping nature of logos and lexis,
res and verba, invention and style, is through the word
"ornament." To our modern sensibilities this suggests a superficial,
inessential decoration--something that might be pleasing but which is not truly
necessary. The etymology of this word is ornare, a Latin verb meaning
"to equip." The ornaments of war, for example, are weapons and
soldiers. The ornaments of rhetoric are not extraneous; they are the equipment
required to achieve the intended meaning or effect.” Likewise the appeals to logic,
emotion, and one’s character are not there to be to standout but rather combine
the various elements of the writing to strengthen it and cohere it together.
By
taking in this information, our next rhetorical papers or arguments should be
stronger since we know what makes a rhetorical paper or argument differ from a
lab report or a book summery. By adding in the elements that appeal to the
three appeals, we can make the paper more personal and give it the depth it
needs to stand out on its own.
Furthermore
this website was mostly helpful in figuring out what rhetorical writing since
it broke down the bare elements of what a rhetorical argument was. By providing
multiple sections and explaining the different concepts in rhetorical writing
it gave us a bigger picture to what was inside a rhetorical argumentative paper
or speech. From explaining that a rhetorical paper is composed of appealing to
the senses and that without it your argument doesn’t have any depth or personality.
While the canon of rhetoric provides an explanation and a template that a paper
or speech is constructed in.
Lastly,
the site was unhelpful due to the way things were written and the type of
vocabulary and language used to write it. Otherwise than being at times hard to
read it was a bit confusing since it refers to multiple sections in a
non-linear order. Along with that it feels that the most of the topics could
have been easily written in three sentences or a simple paragraph rather than
having large sections that bounced around. Also despite having a glossary
sections on the right side of the page, some of the words seem to be unnecessary.
Sure it nice to know the Greek word, but it seems to be just information that
wasn’t need.
Regardless
of the flaws this website, the site has provided the benefit of being able to
clarify and explain what a rhetorical writing is and how it differs from other
forms of writing.
Burton, Giedon O. "The Forest of Rhetoric." Silva
Rhetoricae:. Brigham Young University, 26 Feb. 2007. Web. 23 Jan. 2016.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteYou have mentioned one of the most crucial part ,that got me confuse quite a bit during the whole researching process using this website. The language he used was far too advanced and complex for me to be able to draw a picture in my mind as I read through. Along with that, the amount of metaphor during the introduction alone was very overwhelming, it made me felt like something I would never be able to really utilize it full potential by not completely catch Dr. Burton ideas.
ReplyDeleteI appreciate your point of view about the organization of the site. I assumed that many people found the organization through the forest metaphor to be helpful, however your comments show that perhaps not everyone benefits from this sort of organization. I agree that at times, some of the categories seemed over-complicated and could be simplified to a few sentences or a short paragraph to benefit more inexperienced writers. Also, the number of terms seemed overwhelming as well and somewhat difficult to relate to the more general categories highlighted on the 'tree' side of the site.
ReplyDelete