Week 11_4/7/16_Help I'm being Oppressed.
Political correctness is considered a very important
trait when wanting not to offend any particular group of people by using nondiscriminatory
words or phrases. However using political correctness to not offend or
discriminate anyone might actually offend other groups or individuals because
when referring to one group, one might exclude another group. In article, Letter:
Iowa State is too Politically Correct; Charles Braun explains the issues of being
too politically correct, and how people use it to avoid the unnecessary evils
in our life rather than confront the unnecessary evils that will cause havoc in
our future.
At first Charles list off topics that everyone,
almost without any hesitation would agree to be either a good thing, which are:
diversity, discrimination, and sustainability. Of course these are no doubt
good traits to have and even bad traits to dismiss, but within context these
topics can also be both bad and good. Such as diversity, at first it sounds
like a good thing, having a diverse community with much different type of
people sounds like a nice breeding ground for diverse culture and community. But
as Charles puts it, “Diversity consisting of an axe murderer, a rapist and a
bank robber is not what most students want on their dorm floor”. When context
is provided to what type of diversity is given it no longer sounds like a good
thing, most people just accept the fact that when something is labeled as
having a “diverse culture and community”, people automatically assume that it
is the best for human growth and or development.
Then when it comes to the term sustainability once
again, people only think about the items and things associated with positive ideals,
such as how the world and how the ecosystem will deal with long term pollution
and human activity, and what steps humanity needs to take before the world
reaches environmental destruction. Charles then points out how no one seems to
take notice of the other issues of sustainability, “Take sustainability. A
possible one- or two-degree temperature increase a hundred years from now is
cause for panic, but an unsustainable federal deficit that could collapse our
economy in a few years is ignored”. Once again we are faced with perceptual selectivity
of political correctness, while being blinded by this halo effect of these political
friendly goals. Here people are thinking about the evil of environmental sustainability,
but when in fact people should also worry about the crumbling economic and
social infrastructure of the nation, when in a blink of an eye the nation
people live under could collapse leading to political and social unrest.
These terms we associate with political correctness
and the words we use to differentiate between what is offensive and what is
non-discriminatory doesn’t really work or apply to all mattes of life. While we
focus on one topic such as global warming, we ignore the other possible side of
the coin. Instead of a society of building and strengthening our community, we
cherry pick issues that disturb or simply offend us because in one instance we
are the minority, where in an instance people could be focusing on other issues
affecting the globe rather than Christmas decoration in a public place. Charles
Braun brings this issue to light, showing how Iowa University has becoming a
mono culture society specifically tailoring needs to the “minorities” in order
to become what is considered a diverse,
nondiscrimination, and sustainability culture.
I agree with you on the fact that there are multiple was to interpret 'diversity,' 'sustainability' and 'discrimination,' however I believe that Braun is failing to understand the environment and context in which these words are being used. When talking about diversity on college campuses, the idea is to have diversity of culture, ethnicity, race, socioeconomic status, gender identity, sexuality, political alignment and physical and mental ability etcetera, not in the context that is being represented in his argument. I do agree, however, that oftentimes important issues that are prominent and affect us today are swept under the rug in order to talk about issues of discrimination. However, I think that those issues, such as the environment, still need to be addressed alongside issues of economy.
ReplyDelete