Iowa State is
too Politically Correct
The
article I chose to write about discusses the idea that maybe Iowa State University
may be too politically correct. My rhetorical analysis will give a brief
description of the ideas present in the article itself and the context, and
will then discuss the audience, author, purpose and the use of ethos, pathos
and logos.
The
article talks about diversity, discrimination as well as sustainability. The
author is lobbying for the idea of the free discussion of ideas and the
importance that this holds in such a large and well known university. Charles Braun
states that “some actions may offend people, even when no offense is intended.”
This is relevant as often times people are too sensitive and often take things
the wrong way.
This
leads our discussion into the intended audience for this article. The author,
Charles Braun uses interesting language in the way that he presents the ideas
for the article. Being an older gentleman also says a lot about who he is. He
states one idea very boldly and says that “…we should appreciate our right to
be annoyed, instead of attributing malice where none exists.” While I would not
use the term radical, he definitely has some ideas that would be considered
controversial and some that would be considered daring. This describes a lot
about his audience. Here he is assuming that his audience agrees with him on
all or at least most of what he is saying. The audience of this is assumed to
be at least college age, or most usually older than that. He went to school in
the eighties, and therefore, it is assumed that many people would see the same
problems that he is seeing with his alma mater. The way he writes, the intended
audience would be someone who believes that there is a problem with media and
the current way that there is a divide between what is acceptable and what is
politically correct.
The
purpose of this article is to convince the audience that there is a problem
with the divide and difference between what the media portrays as right, and
what is deemed as politically correct. Braun does a good job with this, giving
many examples and playing with the emotions, values and logic of the audience.
This leads into his usage of appeals.
Braun
appeals to the logic of his audience with the example of why it is not
acceptable to put up Christmas trees during the holiday season, but it is okay
to leave a zodiac sign on the floor that many people have to walk over daily.
He then appeals to the emotions of the audience by showing the difference between
loving your body, with the pirate example and the sex change idea. Braun also
appeals to the values of the audience by the free condom example and showing
that the university assumes that the students there are incapable of
controlling themselves and can only shoot for second best.
Overall,
Charles Braun did a good job at centering his ideas on his intended audience with
his use of appeals, general context and use of examples. This is defiantly a
problem that needs to be addressed.
Braun, Charles.
Iowa State is too Politically Correct. Iowa
State Daily. Web. NP. April 2016
I really liked the article you picked, I read this one as well. I do agree when you quoted about actions that may offend people, even though they were not intended to. I think that in today's society, we are so focused on watching what we say, because we do not want to offend anyone. There are certain times where inappropriate statements should not be said, but I think that people do say things unintentionally.
ReplyDeleteI chose this article too; it really interested me on how Braun explained some of his points. I agree with the logical appeal you chose on how the university does not put up Christmas trees. Great post!
ReplyDelete